archived: 4 - 10 May, 2008 Back Next
UPDATED: MAY 8, 2008WHO
Who does the public blame for rising oil prices? Bush!
A Survey USA poll:
|
1000 Adults |
All |
|
Margin of Sampling Error: ± 3.2% |
|
|
U.S. Oil Companies |
29% |
|
Bush Administration |
40% |
|
Oil Producing Countries |
16% |
|
U.S. Auto Companies |
2% |
|
Environmental Laws |
9% |
|
Someone Else |
4% |
|
Not Sure |
0% |
|
Total |
100% |
The plurality comes largely from Democrats and Independents who are moderate to liberal. All four classifications attribute higher gasoline prices to Bush.
|
1000 Adults |
||||||
|
Margin of Sampling Error: ± 3.2% |
||||||
|
U.S. Oil Companies |
33% |
25% |
26% |
30% |
29% |
23% |
|
Bush Administration |
16% |
57% |
37% |
23% |
39% |
59% |
|
Oil Producing Countries |
25% |
12% |
15% |
22% |
18% |
10% |
|
U.S. Auto Companies |
2% |
2% |
3% |
2% |
1% |
4% |
|
Environmental Laws |
19% |
3% |
10% |
20% |
7% |
1% |
|
Someone Else |
5% |
1% |
10% |
3% |
5% |
4% |
|
Not Sure |
0% |
1% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
|
Total |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
|
Composition of Adults |
29% |
42% |
21% |
29% |
37% |
14% |
Democrats need to expand the message simply from Bush to Republican economic policy. With gasoline rising steadily towards $4.00 per gallon, the message that Democrats need to be spreading is the Republican Party’s responsibility for rising prices.
_____________________________________________
UPDATED: MAY 4, 2008LOUISIANA 6TH
Democrats have retaken another Republican Congressional District. Democrat Don Cazayoux has apparently won the 6th Congressional District, The District has not been held by a Democrat since the 1970’s and Bush won 59% of the vote in this Republican performing District in 2004.
The nearly final results with 99% of precincts reporting:
|
Candidate |
Votes |
% of Vote |
|
Don Cazayoux (D) |
49,312 |
49.24% |
|
Woody Jenkins (R) |
46,282 |
46.22% |
|
Ashley Casey (I-R) |
3,705 |
3.70% |
This election is also interesting from the perspective that Republicans directly attacked Cazayoux by linking him to Sen. Obama and Speaker Pelosi;
The Republican loss is serious and another canary in the coal mine that 2008 could be a Democratic tsunami. Republican Party officials in Washington must now be truly alarmed.
GUAM
While not receiving much attention within the continental US, Guam held its Democratic Primary Saturday. The results: Obama wins by 7 votes out of 4,500 ballots cast.
Neither candidate campaigned on the island in
person.
Results of the all-night count completed Sunday morning Guam time show delegates
pledged to Obama with 2,264 votes to 2,257 for Clinton's slate.
The territory sends four pledged delegates and five super delegates to the
National Convention in August in Denver, although U.S. citizens on the island
have no vote in the November election.
Hillary and Obama will split the 4 pledged delegates.
Obama’s campaign had predicted a double digit victory of about 11%. That obviously did not occur.
Both campaigns will be trying to sort through the reasons this race closed to a virtual tie.
TURNING TIDE?
Alan I. Abramowitz publishes a fascinating study in The Crystal Ball (a TPJ favorite) detailing the long term demographic opportunities for Democrats. This article is a must read for all Democrats.
Abramowitz finds:
Discussions of the current political situation and comparisons between the 2008 election and earlier contests frequently overlook a crucial fact. As a result of changes in American society, today's electorate is very different from the electorate of twenty, thirty, or forty years ago. Three long-term trends have been especially significant in this regard: increasing racial diversity, declining rates of marriage, and changes in religious beliefs. As a result of these trends, today's voters are less likely to be white, less likely to be married, and less likely to consider themselves Christians than voters of just a few decades ago.
The combined impact of these trends on the composition of the electorate has been dramatic. Married white Christians now make up less than half of all voters in the United States and less than one fifth of voters under the age of 30. The declining proportion of married white Christians in the electorate has important political implications because in recent years married white Christians have been among the most loyal supporters of the Republican Party. In American politics today, whether you are a married white Christian is a much stronger predictor of your political preferences than your gender or your class -- the two demographic characteristics that dominate much of the debate on contemporary American politics.
APRIL SHOWERS
April polling closed with Bush at the lowest level of public approval and high rate of disapproval recorded during his administration. Of 11 polls released, Bush’s approval rating was above 30% in only 2 polls.
After a year of Bush’s approval rating holding steady between 32% and 34%, Bush’s approval rating has resumed its downward trend over the last 38 months. The political implications are clear. Bush is no longer holding the support of his Republican base. NBC/Wall Street Journal notes:
Back in April, 75 percent of Republicans approved of Bush’s job performance, compared with 21 percent who disapproved. Now, only 62 percent of Republican approve, versus 32 percent who disapprove.
One poll, CNN/Opinion Research finds Bush’s disapproval rating at an historic high of 71%. It should be noted that no other polling firm in April finds disapproval at 70% or above.
Bush is now achieving historic sustained lows. Given the state of the economy and the rising turmoil in Iraq, one would expect that May polling may bring even lower approval ratings.
|
|
|
Approve |
Trail Mo |
Disapprove |
No Opinion |
Spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CNN/Opinion Research |
4/28-30/08 |
28 |
|
71 |
1 |
-43 |
|
|
FOX/Opinion Dynamics |
4/28-29/08 |
32 |
|
60 |
8 |
-28 |
|
|
CBS/New York Times |
4/25-29/08 |
28 |
|
65 |
7 |
-37 |
|
|
NBC/Wall Street Journal |
4/25-28/08 |
27 |
|
66 |
7 |
-39 |
|
|
Pew |
4/23-27/08 |
27 |
|
65 |
8 |
-38 |
|
|
USA Today/Gallup |
4/18-20/08 |
28 |
|
69 |
4 |
-41 |
|
|
Newsweek |
4/16-17/08 |
28 |
|
65 |
7 |
-37 |
|
|
ABC/Washington Post |
4/10-13/08 |
33 |
|
64 |
2 |
-31 |
|
|
Gallup |
4/6/-9/08 |
28 |
|
67 |
5 |
-39 |
|
|
AP-Ipsos |
4/7-9/08 |
28 |
|
68 |
4 |
-40 |
|
|
CBS/New York Times |
3/28 - 4/2/08 |
28 |
|
64 |
8 |
-36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April Avg |
28.64 |
-2.26 |
65.82 |
5.55 |
-37.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March Avg |
30.90 |
-1.66 |
63.60 |
5.30 |
-32.70 |
|
|
|
February Avg |
32.56 |
0.22 |
62.56 |
4.67 |
-30.00 |
|
|
|
January Avg |
32.33 |
-1.12 |
63.13 |
4.47 |
-30.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|||||